|
Post by lovexc on Oct 18, 2007 20:58:21 GMT -5
does any one elsee notice how the AA girls seems to be just thrown together?
|
|
|
Post by emkicks7 on Oct 18, 2007 22:30:13 GMT -5
yes.
|
|
|
Post by ROCK on Oct 19, 2007 7:09:12 GMT -5
Sorry to disappoint you all. They are somewhat thrown together, however I do look over all of the results from those teams and do a comparison. I try to make an accurate rank for the AA Girls. I didn't sign on to do this. We had someone ready and willing to do this, then he didn't do the week 1 rankings and told us he couldn't do it. I was kind of forced into the job. It does take a couple of hours per week to do this, and those are hours I don't have. Between coaching, teaching, doing the other things for the website, my kids, & my wife there's hardly enough time for anything else.
This job will be open again next year. If you know of anyone who is interested in doing this, feel free to email me. I don't plan on doing this again next year.
With that being said, I also like seeing who disagrees/agrees with my rankings. Tell me what you think. I can accept the above criticism, I think it's fair. Hopefully we can grow into this three class system.
|
|
|
Post by moocher on Oct 19, 2007 8:07:40 GMT -5
I want to thank you for doing this. The kids have been so excited to see were, or if they are ranked. They really don't care how accurate they were this year. For most of the AA schools this might be the first time they have ever been ranked. That sure has been a great motivator. Thanks for the effort
|
|
|
Post by xcrnr2 on Oct 19, 2007 10:51:23 GMT -5
I think you do a pretty accurate job with the rankings, it is nice to have a place to see how other teams in the state are running.
|
|
|
Post by ccalum on Oct 19, 2007 15:00:04 GMT -5
The rankings are okay, not great. I sure don't think Crystal Lake Central is a 20th ranked team. They haven't been running well as of late, but they still are pretty loaded 1-5 with talent.
|
|
|
Post by lovexc on Oct 19, 2007 17:23:28 GMT -5
5Dixon 19:29 6:30 8Dixon 19:54 6:38 9Sycamore 19:55 6:39 10Sycamore 19:55 6:39 11Dixon 20:17 6:46 16Dixon 20:36 6:52 17Sycamore 20:43 6:55 18Sycamore 20:45 6:55 19Sycamore 20:46 6:55 22Sycamore 21:14 7:05 32Sycamore 21:38 7:13 54Dixon 23:01 7:41 66Dixon 23:53 7:58 68Dixon 24:26 8:09
Dixon= 94 Sycamore=73 this is from sterling... i read some where else that at this meet sycamore ran some girls in the jv race so i found the best runners...this means sycamore should be ahead of dixon by far.
also...
"Rock Falls-Loss of top two runners for the season hurts 20:00-22:59"
sycamore is running better than them...
|
|