|
|
Post by xrunner182x on Nov 18, 2007 15:38:10 GMT -5
Why should Derrick's time be considered the record? There shouldn't even be a discussion. If he didn't run faster than the record time, 13:51.6, then it's not a record. I mean I don't mean to be a negative person here and personally Derrick is one of my running heros, but he didn't run the time.
Any comments?
|
|
|
|
Post by xtremedistance43 on Nov 19, 2007 15:53:27 GMT -5
Chirs Derricks time should be the new record because craig virgin ran the best time on a shortened, different course. The detweiler course was revised a while after he ran it, so really, Chris derrick has the fastest time on the new course
|
|
|
|
Post by tiaharveyfan on Nov 19, 2007 16:58:26 GMT -5
its so obvious that he should have the course record. everyone has unanimously decieded that one.
|
|
|
|
Post by frontrunnerxc on Nov 22, 2007 11:50:47 GMT -5
Why should Derrick's time be considered the record? There shouldn't even be a discussion. If he didn't run faster than the record time, 13:51.6, then it's not a record. I mean I don't mean to be a negative person here and personally Derrick is one of my running heros, but he didn't run the time. Any comments? yeah, i have comments first of all, when virgin ran his record of 13:50.6, not 13:51.6 as you stated, the course was not a full three miles. Second, when derrick ran his 13:51.8 at state, the course may not have been exactly three miles, yet it was still longer than the course virgin ran in highschool, and i hardly think 1.2 seconds is enough to cover that distance. derrick has the record as far as i can see |
|
|
|
Post by ww1313 on Nov 23, 2007 16:14:06 GMT -5
Of course Derrick's time should be the record!
|
|
|
|
Post by alowe007 on Dec 8, 2007 19:58:36 GMT -5
2 different courses = 2 different records
|
|
